I’ve set out
to get off social security disability payments for 2015—so far so good. I’m still receiving a monthly check but am
working full time doing maintenance at a hospital. In six months my payments will be a thing of
the past.
For a while,
I thought myself to not be able to have as strong a voice for anarchy as a
recipient of state funded disability payments.
I am here to say that we all should benefit from the state for as long
as it is in existence. Anarchy does not
have to be about not making use of subsidiary funding provided to people for
whom assistance is necessary. Anarchy is
a philosophy that suggests without centralized control of wealth and power our
society would be more equitable, and
less corrupted. We could provide better care
to those who need it because the care provided would be decentralized.
Working is
important to me—and getting off disability will help me to stand up for my
convictions. But there should be no
shame in receiving subsidiary assistance.
Communities pulling together to assist those whose lives are especially
challenging is more in line with anarchist ideologies than maybe any other
concept I know.
To create
anarchy we need not only focus on abolishing the state. And we need not denounce the state funded
programs which help those in need. We
need, instead, to find alternative ways to work towards social equanimity which
minimize the need for governance.
Working together, as men and women of a free society, is our only means
to minimizing the need for centralized control or political power. Political upheaval will come when the people
claim responsibility to each other in the global community.
What would
be better if the person who provided subsidiary funding to another person with
a disability knew the person whom they were helping? Imagine if funds provided to those with
disabilities were not provided by a body of governing officials—but instead, by
a father or close friend. Anarchy is a
philosophy that the people hold the power to a free state.
I am working
towards minimizing my reliance on the state for my independence. As I make progress I will afford greater
realization of my own personal sanctity.
As much as I can, I will disallow that the state influence how I am to
lead my life. But in the mean time I
will know that my voice is strong because I am a human being—just like everyone
else.
No comments:
Post a Comment