Debate
pervades regarding the existence of free will; interestingly, it is in this
debate that science and religion share a common ground. Faith based religions have for centuries
argued that our life-paths are decided by a higher power. Today’s neuroscience has characterized a
modality of human function, which, in conjunction with understanding of complex
emotional displacement, has eliminated the function of will. Not all within psychiatry—and probably not
all within neuroscience—disbelieve in the existence of free will; there are
enough, however, that I feel it important to consider this debate.
Our decision
making is part of a psychic make-up which is mostly decided by genes and
environment. If you were to look at the
statistics regarding drug abuse, homelessness, incarceration, mental illness,
suicide, and other maladies you would see an astronomical correlation to
abusive childhood environments.
The factors
of genes and environment influence lives with such force that sometimes people,
who are charged with a criminal offense, are found not guilty because of their
compromised decision making ability. The
premise is, very simply, that in certain situations, people, who suffer from a
psychological disorder, or drug abuse, cannot be considered culpable for their
offense. Our minds are so sensitive to
environment, drug abuse, trauma, and psychological disorder that reason may
escape a person; convicting such people is thought to be a violation against
civil liberty.
Less than a
week ago, a friend and I had a brief but spirited debate on the existence of
free will. He is a theologian. And he expressed a belief in a higher power
which decides our life-paths for us. I
am an agnostic. But I try to be open to the
influence of spirituality in my life-path.
But maybe, I’m just stumbling along failing to have faith in a higher
power.
My belief is
that our genes are like a road map which we use for guidance to lead better,
more satisfying lives. And our
environment might be like the directions we are given by a friend—whose house
we are visiting. We have to transform
the information, given by our road map and directions, into action for our
desired route to take us where we intend.
Taking in information from our genetic map, and environmental
directions, are not passive—they must be interpreted. Will is involved in receiving information,
energy, strength and other such resources we use to navigate the world we live
in.
Sometimes
people give bad directions; in such instances, the person driving cannot be to
blame if she gets lost. No one is fully
in control of their own destiny; at times, people can be considered to not be
in control in any way at all.
There is a lot that intercedes which acts as an antagonist force to our
autonomy. Maybe this is a good
thing. Maybe I’d be better off if I had
a higher power deciding how I am to lead my life. Maybe I just need to better understand the
will of this higher power to better direct the life I’ve been given. But I continue to believe that I have at
least a slight influence on how that higher power is interpreted, and thus, how
her guidance is used in my directing my own life. And I believe that cultivating self-awareness
is the best means to walking an enlightened path. I will always be curious and questioning. But I do not believe that I will ever submit
to any doctrine or dogma which is fatalistic.
No comments:
Post a Comment